Emphasizing  moral taboos like "cussing" can lead to bad moral priorities.
Jesus described some things as  gnats and some things as camels (Matt 23:23).  He chided the Pharisees  for the amount of effort they put into avoiding swallowing "gnats," but  how they exerted very little effort at avoiding swallowing "camels."   Doesn't some people's attitudes and behaviors about cussing fall under  this same scrutiny?
 
People walk out of movie  theaters when there's cussing, but how do those same people feel about  millions of children dying of preventable diseases?  People would likely  be shocked, offended, and even walk out of a church if their preacher  were to cuss from the pulpit.  Would they react at least as offended if  he were to say in a subtle way that they had little or no obligation to  help the poor?  
People can become so offended by hearing cussing  that they will confront complete strangers and tell them to stop  cussing.  Do they become at least as offended when people are  unforgiving or unmerciful or indifferent toward each other?  People get  alarmed when they can hear their neighbors cuss outside their houses.   Are they equally as alarmed that their neighbors are not followers of  Christ and may be eternally lost?   
Is some arbitrary word-list  that we deem offensive really as important as the rest of these things?   If it's at least equally important, then why don't our reactions to all  these things reflect being equally offended?  i think it's arguably the  case that these other things are more important than cussing, yet it's  certainly not the case that people on the whole act more offended  by those things than by cussing.
We would get up and stomp out  of a church in a huff if a preacher cuss, but we're perfectly content to  sit in a cuss-free church service all the while bearing a grudge  against someone in the room.  What does that say about our moral  priorities?  What does that say about what matters most to us?

 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment